Hydrodemolition Techniques Used at an Australian Mine

John Hooper on behalf of Aquajet Systems AB
Special Collaboration



One of Australia’s leading hydrodemolition specialist contractor’s, HiTech Industrial Services, has removed a defective section of blade wall from a mine in Mackay, Queensland, using two Aquajet robot cutters; a method that allowed continuous working despite the proximity of a railway line that placed restrictions on conventional demolition methods.

The problem had arisen when an incorrect batch of concrete had been poured for a section of the blade wall measuring 9.3 m high by 9.3 m long and with a thickness of 1 m.

Removal of the section was necessary, but had wire sawing techniques been used the deployment of the crane would have had to be scheduled around railway shutdowns.
“Using the two Aqua Cutter robots meant that our total time on-site was just four weeks, compared with an estimated six

months or more that a crane and wire saw would have required,” says HiTech’s operations manager Damien Turner.
HiTech – which was formed in 1991 specifically to pioneer and specialize in high pressure hydrodemolition and water jetting services – used an Aqua Cutter 710V Evolution and an Aqua Cutter HVD6000 from Sweden’s leading hydrodemolition manufacturer, Aquajet Systems AB; delivered through local distributor, Adelaide-based Metco Ltd.

The 710V Evolution robot was equipped with an 11 m mast to enable it to comfortably reach the top of the wall. It has been designed for all horizontal, vertical and overhead operations, having a 3-D positioning of the front power head; giving the operator full freedom to reach all areas and to work in confined areas.

The HVD6000, which has a similar 3-D feature, was fitted with a standard 5 m mast.

“There was a 32,000 V rail line behind the site that is used to transport coal. The line is just 2 m behind the wall,” says Mr. Turner. “We proposed placing an 8 mm thick steel plate behind the wall, which was supported by formwork and props, to prevent flying debris hitting the trains. It also stopped the jet from hitting the power cables.

“Apart from the speed and convenience of the removal rate using hydrodemolition techniques, the idea of the 8 mm safety shield helped us to win the contract. It was important that the trains continued working. A full trainload of coal is valued at A$3 million ($3 million), so it was important to ensure there were no delays.”

Mr. Turner says that although HiTech was on site for 4 weeks and working or on standby 24/7, the removal of the full 86 m³ of defective concrete was achieved in just 172 blasting hours.

“There was a good deal of reorganizing and other work going on at the site, and so much of our time was spent on active standby,” he said. “The actual work presented no unexpected problems for the Aquajet robots.”

The concrete being removed was 40 MPa, with the reinforcing bars being 32 mm diameter with generally between 150 and 200 mm spacing, although in some places the spacing was only 50 mm.

Use of hydrodemolition ensured that the rebar was not damaged in any way whilst removing the defective concrete.
Mr. Turner says that hydrodemolition in Australia is still a relatively novel concept, but that with the technique proving to be so efficient, acceptance is spreading.

Basic Principles of Hydrodemolition
The key element of Hydrodemolition is to pressurise and widen existing pores and micro cracks in the weakened concrete structure using high pressure water penetration.

Material is easily removed as the build up pressure exceeds the tensile strength of the damaged or weakened concrete.
In addition to the water pressure, the volume of water is also a contributing factor to the systems efficiency. The rate of removal, for example, is dependent on the amount of water directed towards the concrete surface in order to rapidly and continuously pressurise the areas being treated.

This combination of water pressure and flow together with the controlled kinetic and geometric movements of the robotic equipment creates the necessary “effect” criteria for the Hydrodemolition process; leaving sound concrete undamaged.
Research into water jet erosion has shown that the concrete resistance against water jet removal is dependent on concrete strength, method of finishing the concrete, aggregate size and the content of steel reinforcement bars.

The lower the concrete strength, the larger the material removal rate that can be achieved due to larger penetration and pressurisation of the material. Additionally, the higher the cement matrix strength the higher the concrete resistance.
This is due to the increased difference in the compressive strength of the construction and the penetration effect of the water jets pressure, water volume and jet movement.

Surface Quality
It is proven that Hydrodemolition produces an excellent clean surface quality. The pull-off strength, which is an important indicator of the surface structure conditions, exceeds the required 1.5 MPa (N/mm2) value with a 95% reliability.
If the surface is prepared with water jets, the interfaced zone between the remaining concrete and the new cast overlay very seldom constitutes a plane of weakness.

This compares favorably with a surface prepared with hand-held tools which results in a higher probability on interface failures at pull-off testing.

With water jet Hydrodemolition, once programmed, the jet moves rapidly and continuously over the selected area for removal. There is no percussive effect on the surface with the water jet penetrating the deteriorated concrete. Extensive investigations have proved that there is no modification of the concrete microstructure during the water jet treatment. Similarly the concrete pore structure is not affected by the water jet.

The surface geometry achieved after Hydrodemolition depends on the type and size of the aggregate. With limestone, for example, the surface is comparatively smooth and characterized by a high degree of fractured aggregate gains.
In contrast, quartzite containing concrete exhibits an uneven surface and a high amount of undamaged aggregates.
Compared with other removal methods, Hydrodemolition generates a very large contact surface between the concrete and applied coating system.


© InfraStructures - Tous droits réservés - All rights reserved